Recently, Zachary Levi, the actor best known for his roles in Marvel’s ‘Shazam!’ and NBC’s ‘Chuck,’ has come under fire for his comments on social media. This controversy has left many fans wondering what exactly is going on. In this article, we will explore the details of this situation and explain the Zachary Levi controversy.
The Mystery Behind Zachary Levi’s Controversy Explored
Zachary Levi, an actor and the protagonist of Shazam!, has been criticized for a tweet of January 28, 2023, which appeared to be anti-vaccine.
For the uninitiated, anti-vaccine is a slang term for individuals who reject vaccination.
Levi’s post was published just days following the debut of the second trailer for DCEU’s Shazam!: Fury of the Gods. While the actor’s tweets are unrelated to the DC films, his statement and its likely ramifications reflect a controversial stance on the COVID-19 vaccine controversy, which could affect how audiences see his movie.
The businessman Lyndon Wood, @Lyndonx, tweeted on January 17, 2023, “Do you agree that Pfizer is a real danger to the world?”
Zachary Levi responded to the question,
Hardcore agree. 😐 https://t.co/goeEf5UQ5s
— Zachary Levi (@ZacharyLevi) January 29, 2023
Read More: Brittany Aldean’s Instagram controversy angers Maren Morris and Cassadee Pope
“Is Zachary Levi Anti-Vaccine?”
Levi tweeted his agreement with the apparent hazards of biotech, pharmaceutical company Pfizer at the end of January 2023. The global corporation responsible for one of the most widely distributed COVID-19 vaccinations has been under constant attack from disinformation propagated primarily by persons on the far right.
On Twitter, Levi expressed what many consider to be anti-vaccination beliefs. This account does not belong to a medical professional. Lyndon Woods is a wealthy entrepreneur who promotes himself as a self-made person; however, he is neither a scientist nor does he appear to have evidence to support his assertions.
Read More: Neil Patrick Harris Apologizes For The Controversy Regarding Amy Winehouse
There is no evidence that Pfizer, which has also undertaken research and developed numerous other vaccines for various other medical diseases, is anything other than a vast pharmaceutical corporation. Most of the company’s non-COVID-related criticism stems from the highly Americanized manner in which it “unfairly” increased its prices in the United Kingdom, resulting in a £63 million punishment.
Levi uses a decade-old $2.3 billion Department of Justice fine against Pfizer for false marketing to support his concerns. However, this lawsuit involves Pfizer marketing alternative uses and unrecommended dosages for the anti-inflammatory Bextra, evading the Food and Drug Administration’s requirement that the drug’s exact purpose be defined.
Read More: Casey Affleck Controversy: What to Know About the Story
James Gunn Addresses The Outcry Against Zachary Levi’s Criticism Of Pfizer
James Gunn has replied to the issue over Zachary Levi’s criticism of the pharmaceutical company Pfizer. This week, Levi, the lead character in the DC superhero flick Shazam! and its upcoming sequel, responded to a tweet wondering if the pharmaceutical business posed a “real danger to the world.” This prompted some fans to perceive his remarks as being anti-vaccination.
In a later follow-up post, however, Levi gave additional context for his tweet by providing a link to a 2009 US Department of Justice press release announcing the “largest health care fraud settlement in the country’s history.”
He wrote, “Just one example of what I’m referring to.”
Just one example of what I’m referring to…😔https://t.co/5xCpCSCDrl
— Zachary Levi (@ZacharyLevi) January 29, 2023
This week, Gunn, the director of Guardians of the Galaxy who was recently named head of DC Studios alongside producer Peter Safran, was asked about the controversy.
A few days ago, Zach Levi tweeted about immunizations, which angered several individuals. “I’m not sure if you have a remark on that,” a reporter questioned.
Gunn responded,
Actors [and] filmmakers I work with are going to say things that I agree with and don’t agree with. That’s going to happen. I don’t have a list of things somebody should say because of what I think. I can’t change my plans all the time because an actor says something that I disagree with.
By the same token, if someone is doing something morally reprehensible, that’s a different story. We have to take that stuff into account. It’s a balance. It’s a modern world; It’s a different place.